table of contents

No headings found on page

Workflow & Productivity

Sharing Projects

Intermediate

5 min read

... views

Sharing Projects

Share Framer projects with teammates, clients, and stakeholders to collect feedback, review progress, and collaborate more effectively.

Overview

Sharing projects is an important part of the website creation process. Whether you’re working with a client, collaborating with a team, or presenting designs to stakeholders, being able to share work quickly and clearly helps keep projects moving forward.

Framer makes it easy to share websites throughout different stages of development, from early concepts and design reviews to final approval and publication.

This guide explains common project-sharing workflows, best practices, and tips for improving collaboration during reviews.

Why Share Projects?

Project sharing helps:

  • Gather feedback

  • Improve collaboration

  • Review progress

  • Present ideas

  • Validate design decisions

  • Reduce misunderstandings

Regular reviews often lead to better outcomes and fewer surprises later in the project.

Common Project Sharing Scenarios

Projects are commonly shared with:

  • Clients

  • Team members

  • Stakeholders

  • Marketing teams

  • Content creators

  • Project managers

Each group may review different aspects of the website.

Sharing During Design

Early project sharing can help identify issues before significant work is completed.

Examples include:

  • Homepage concepts

  • Layout directions

  • Branding explorations

  • Navigation structures

Early feedback often prevents major revisions later.

Sharing for Content Reviews

Content reviews help ensure information is accurate and complete.

Review:

  • Headlines

  • Body content

  • CTAs

  • Product information

  • Service descriptions

Content approval should ideally happen before launch.

Sharing for Design Feedback

Design reviews often focus on:

  • Layouts

  • Typography

  • Colors

  • Visual hierarchy

  • Branding consistency

Structured design reviews typically produce more useful feedback.

Sharing Responsive Layouts

A website should be reviewed across multiple devices.

When sharing projects, encourage reviewers to test:

  • Desktop layouts

  • Tablet layouts

  • Mobile layouts

Responsive issues are easier to fix before launch.

Sharing CMS-Powered Websites

CMS projects require additional review.

Verify:

  • Dynamic pages

  • Collection structures

  • Images

  • Categories

  • Content formatting

Reviewers should understand how dynamic content behaves across the website.

Sharing Before Launch

A final review should occur before publishing.

Review:

  • Navigation

  • Forms

  • SEO settings

  • Responsive behavior

  • Content accuracy

A final approval process helps reduce launch-day issues.

Presenting Projects Effectively

When sharing projects, provide context.

Explain:

  • Project goals

  • Target audience

  • Design decisions

  • Requested feedback

Reviewers often provide better feedback when they understand the objectives.

Request Specific Feedback

General feedback can be difficult to act on.

Instead of asking:

What do you 
What do you 
What do you 

Ask:

Does the homepage clearly communicate our services?

Is the navigation easy to understand?

Are the CTAs visible enough

Does the homepage clearly communicate our services?

Is the navigation easy to understand?

Are the CTAs visible enough

Does the homepage clearly communicate our services?

Is the navigation easy to understand?

Are the CTAs visible enough

Specific questions usually produce more actionable responses.

Organize Feedback

As projects grow, feedback can become difficult to manage.

Group feedback into categories such as:

  • Content

  • Design

  • SEO

  • Functionality

  • Mobile responsiveness

Organization helps prioritize improvements.

Avoid Too Many Reviewers

While feedback is valuable, too many opinions can create conflicting direction.

Focus on feedback from:

  • Key stakeholders

  • Decision makers

  • Relevant contributors

Clear ownership helps prevent unnecessary revisions.

Share Progress Regularly

Waiting until a project is nearly finished can create unexpected challenges.

Regular reviews help:

  • Align expectations

  • Identify issues early

  • Reduce major revisions

  • Improve communication

Small reviews are often more effective than one large review.

Preparing Projects for Review

Before sharing:

  • Organize layers

  • Review content

  • Test layouts

  • Verify navigation

  • Remove unfinished sections

A polished presentation helps reviewers focus on meaningful feedback.

Sharing Projects With Clients

When sharing with clients:

  • Explain project goals

  • Provide review instructions

  • Clarify timelines

  • Document feedback requests

Clear communication helps maintain productive client relationships.

Sharing Projects Internally

Internal reviews may focus on:

  • Branding

  • Marketing goals

  • Technical requirements

  • Content quality

  • SEO considerations

Cross-functional reviews often improve website quality.

Managing Revisions

Not every suggestion needs to be implemented.

Evaluate feedback based on:

  • User needs

  • Business goals

  • Project scope

  • Design consistency

Feedback should support the project’s objectives.

Common Project Sharing Mistakes

Sharing Too Late

Late-stage feedback often results in larger revisions.

Share progress early and regularly.

Requesting Vague Feedback

General comments are often difficult to act on.

Ask targeted questions.

Ignoring Mobile Reviews

Desktop-only reviews may overlook important usability issues.

Always review mobile layouts.

Sharing Incomplete Work Without Context

Reviewers may misunderstand unfinished designs.

Clearly communicate what is complete and what is still in progress.

Collecting Feedback Without Prioritization

Not all feedback has equal importance.

Focus on suggestions that align with project goals.

Best Practices

  • Share projects regularly

  • Request specific feedback

  • Review responsive layouts

  • Organize feedback clearly

  • Present project goals

  • Involve key stakeholders

  • Test before sharing

  • Document revisions

  • Maintain clear communication

  • Focus on actionable improvements

Final Thoughts

Project sharing is more than simply showing work to others. It’s an opportunity to gather insights, validate decisions, and improve the overall quality of a website before launch.

By sharing projects regularly, asking focused questions, and creating structured review processes, you can improve collaboration, reduce misunderstandings, and build better websites more efficiently.

Frequently Asked Questions

When should I start sharing a project?

It’s often beneficial to share projects early, especially when reviewing layouts, branding, or navigation concepts.

Who should review a website?

Reviewers may include clients, stakeholders, designers, marketers, content creators, and other team members involved in the project.

How can I get better feedback?

Ask specific questions instead of requesting general opinions.

Should I share mobile versions too?

Yes. Responsive layouts should always be reviewed before launch.

What should I review before sharing a project?

Check content, navigation, responsiveness, functionality, and overall presentation quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sharing Projects?

This article explains the key concepts, best practices, and practical applications related to sharing projects.

Why is sharing projects important?

Understanding sharing projects can help improve implementation, decision-making, and overall results.

What are the main takeaways from sharing projects?

The article highlights common best practices, recommendations, and important considerations readers should understand.

framerbaseio

Your home for Framer support.

framerbaseio

Your home for Framer support.

© 2026 Framerbase.io

This [website/service/content] is independent of Framer and is not authorized by, endorsed by, sponsored by, affiliated with, or otherwise approved by Framer B.V.

This [website/service/content] is independent of Framer and is not authorized by, endorsed by, sponsored by, affiliated with, or otherwise approved by Framer B.V.